Send Help Review

 

Send Help tells the story of unappreciated and survivor-obsessed worker bee Linda Liddle (played by Rachel McAdams) and her new arrogant CEO Bradley (played by Dylan O’Brien), who must fight to survive when they’re stranded on a desert island after a plane crash, but not against the elements, but against each other.

The biggest standout in this movie for me is Rachel McAdams's performance. The way she’s able to play this very shy and dowdy secretary and then transform into this super confident survivalist who gets pretty sadistic and intense but never loses that friendly coworker attitude is really fun to watch, and McAdams is able to flow between the two in a very natural and really fun way to watch as she gets more confident throughout the film. At some point, you’re rooting for her, and at other points, you’re mad at her. Definitely one of my new favorite performances from her.

Dylan O’Brien is also very good at playing a very full, almost frat bro-like CEO. I do wish his character was a little bit more fleshed out like Adam’s, but there are several moments throughout where you see different sides of Bradley and have different emotions throughout. I just thought for me there could have been a little more of them, but again, O’Brien is very entertaining at playing this cocky idiot who you enjoy seeing taken down a peg every once in a while.

Ironically, for a movie that for 85% of its runtime takes place in one location, this movie is very stunning. Obviously, they filmed on actual beaches, and all the different tropical locations look very peaceful and stunning and are a good contrast to the characters' emotional journey of becoming more erratic and stir crazy.

The film, for the most part, has a very dark sense of humor, which I’m always down for, but there are a couple of scenes, particularly one between the two characters during a campfire, that I thought really added an interesting character, a wrinkle to both characters, and both actors really get to shine and give strong and enjoyable performances.

The directing is fantastic; Sam Raimi gets to go full Sam Raimi, and I’m always down for that. He does a lot of wild, intense camera movement and a lot of interesting, creative shots, while dripping just a little bit of horror in there. Not to mention some pretty creative, spectacular gore scenes, like there’s one scene during the plane crash that is both disturbing and hilarious at the same time lol.

The CGI, for the most part, is pretty good, like some things do look a little cartoonish, but the design and situation they’re in kind of make it work within the scene as a creative style decision.

I think gore hounds will be satisfied with the effects in this movie; again, there are some CGI parts that I know are not everyone’s cup of tea, but there’s enough blood and bonkers action to keep any horror fan happy.

I also like to have the film overall unfold the story, like certain bits of information aren’t shown and then saved for later to reveal other stuff, and I thought that was pretty creative.

I do have a recommendation if you do plan on seeing this movie. You have to see it in the theater with a pretty big and lively crowd; that’s the best way to enjoy it, like I did. People were laughing and cheering throughout, and there was one scene where you could just feel everyone’s sphincter just tighten with suspense… Good times, lol.

Danny Elfman did the music and did a solid job throughout.

Ironically, for a film where the characters wear pretty much the same outfit throughout, I was impressed with how the costume department was able to change up the outfit with different layers and styles throughout; it was a nice subtle detail.

There are a couple of twists here and there throughout the story that I thought were pretty well integrated and had some nice payoffs.

I wasn’t satisfied with the very end; like, it was OK, but I was hoping for a stronger ending, but it kind of felt like they filmed multiple endings, and this one tested best with audiences. Again, it’s not bad, but I was just hoping for more.

For you Sam Raimi fans out there, yes, there is a Bruce Campbell and Sam’s old station wagon cameo in the film, and I spotted them both; they were very nice.

I also got to see the movie with my pals, which always adds to a movie's enjoyment.

Send Help is a very enjoyable, straightforward dark comedy thriller, with incredible and entertaining performances by the main cast and a beautiful location that really adds something special to this film. I give it somewhere between three stars and a low four stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️ or ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️. It isn’t anything mind-blowing, but it is a really fun time at the movies.

The Housemaid Review

 

Sydney Sweeney plays Millie, a girl with a troubled past who gets a job as a live-in housemate for a wealthy family, and then things get weird and dark…

Sydney Sweeney is very good as Millie; she feels very down-to-earth and relatable, but there is some interesting mystery and twist with her character.

I think the biggest reason to see this is for Amanda Seyfried’s performance (who plays the rich wife, Nina), because she is able to switch from, like, very over-the-top and silly to very intimidating and unhinged in, like, a second. It’s really impressive and very entertaining to watch.

Brandon Sklenar plays the husband, Andrew, who at first seems a little too charming and perfect, but he and Millie have some cute and sweet scenes that really warm you to his character.

The movie does a fun job at building tension and unfolding the mystery while also infusing it with a good amount of dark humor, which is not an easy thing to do, but they do a really impressive job; it feels like Alfred Hitchcock meets Mean Girls.

Paul Feig does a solid job directing and comes up with some pretty cool camera shots, not to mention, for an over two-hour movie, it has a pretty good pacing, like the movie will fly by.

There is a gaggle of rich housewife characters that are a little over the top at points, but they get some good laughs in.

There is a groundskeeper character played by Michele Morrone, who gives a good performance, but I wish they had explored his character more; there just seemed to be more going on with him than they only really scratched the surface of.

There are a couple points in the film where my suspension of disbelief gets stretched a little too much; there are definitely a couple points where I’m like, “Millie, why are you still there? There are more warning signs than a railroad crossing lol.

I quite enjoyed this cinematography; everything looked very idyllic and soft, which fit the fancy house, and it was used very effectively in an almost subversive way towards the end of the film.

So going into this movie, I heard this had a crazy twist, and we’re a good chunk into the film, and I’m sitting there thinking, “OK, this movie is enjoyable, but what is this twist they’re talking about?” Like, I’m trying to predict what it might be, and I have a couple guesses here and there, and for a second I thought, “OK, maybe it’s not going to be that big a twist,” and just when I thought that, that’s when the twist kicked in, and I have to say… I did not see that coming lol.

I will say, I did find the final climax to be a little predictable, not in, like, a bad way, but the rest of the movie had been more intriguing and surprising, and I was hoping the film would end on a bigger plateau, but where it ends up didn’t feel quite as strong and more run-of-the-mill, but still solid.

Also, as well done as that first big twist was, it’s one of those twists that the more you think about, the more certain things feel contrived in certain areas. But honestly, it doesn’t take away from the movie too much, and the movies are entertaining enough that you’re not really distracted by it.

Also, there was one final twist that I thought was OK—that’s way too convenient. Like, you have a better chance of winning the lottery than having that workout. Like it’s not enough to ruin the movie, but man, those odds are thinner than the side of a piece of paper lol.

I also got to see with my sister who explained the differences between the movie and the book afterwards, so that was nice 

Overall, The Housemaid takes a premise that has been explored in many films and adds an interesting new dimension to it, combining both humor and thrills to a point that they’re almost interchangeable, with great performances and direction throughout, and a twist/climax that definitely cranks things up to 11 that most audiences will really be entertained by. I give the film four stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️. Sometimes the movie doesn’t have to be the smartest; it just has to be fun, and this certainly was.

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple review

 

Picking up where the last film left off, we follow two simultaneous stories: one is Spike dealing with the craze and murderous cults known as “The Jimmy’s,” and in the second, we follow Doctor Ian as he befriends and studies the alpha zombie he has nicknamed “Samson.”

Bone Temple is a little different in tone than the last film; where that was more adrenalized and action-oriented, this film goes for a more creepy and almost introspective feel. But it’s still good at retaining the overall tone of this world and capturing similar creepy images as the other 28 Days films.

Ironically, the heart of the film is Ian and Samson's odd friendship and how it develops over the course of the film. It does play with tropes you’ve seen in other zombie movies, with the “the zombies are evolving or getting smarter” type of ideas, but the way it’s executed in Bone Temple is interesting and enjoyable to watch.

The other big standout in the film is Jack O’Connell as the head, Jimmy; he goes from being very reserved and intimidating to surprisingly comedic and more psychologically complex than you would expect. He’s not that bad a guy, I mean, once you get past the murdering imaging stuff, but hey, it’s the zombie apocalypse; who’s gonna be perfect lol?

Another great performance, though she isn’t getting as much attention as Jimmima, is Emma Laird. The actress brought an interesting energy to the role, and the character seemed to have more complexity going on underneath than was expected. Unfortunately, she’s not in the movie as much as I would like, but what time she has, I thought, was a definite standout.

Alfie Williams is solid again as Spike; his character doesn’t get as much to do as in the last film and spends most of the screen time just looking scared and wanting to go home, but given the type of hot water he’s in, you do wonder how he’s going to get out of this and if he’ll even survive.

Spike does befriend one of the other Jimmys, who is hesitant about what’s going on (played by Erin Kellyman), and I wish their friendship had been developed a bit more; it all just happens pretty quickly, and given everything that happens, I feel like more could’ve been done with their friendship developing, and they have two different ideologies about the situation they’re in.

The scenes with the Jimmys can get pretty intense and brutal, not like Terrifier levels or anything, but they can be rough to watch at certain parts. There were definitely a couple moments where I was thinking, “Man, can we cut back to Ian and Sampson and get some levity with those guys?” lol.

The special effects and gore are solid throughout; it runs the gamut from being some of the more fun zombie action gore to some pretty intense and uncomfortable scenes.

I loved the soundtrack in the film; there was a lot of cool 80s and 90s music, especially one standout scene with basically one of the most fun Iron Maiden concerts you will ever see lol.

Nia DaCosta did a great job at recreating the feel of this universe and had some pretty cool stylized and artsy shots, while also making the whole film feel grounded and very gritty.

I have to say, whoever did the prop for Jimmy’s teeth in the movie deserves a raise, because there is not good oral hygiene in the zombie apocalypse, and Jimmy has some of the nastiest, most yellow, corn-looking teeth. I’ve ever seen. It’s a small detail, but it adds to the creepiness of his character in a surprising way, especially when he’s acting all nice and smiling; it’s very unsettling.

Without spoiling anything, I like how they set things up at the end for the next movie; it was clever and a nice surprise.

I also got to see with my buddy Jake, that’s always great 👍

28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is a solid zombies flick; it plays with the genre’s tropes well, and while some scenes get quite brutal at times, the film has plenty of gore and great performances to entertain throughout. I give Bone Temple a low 4 stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️. Here’s hoping the third installment sticks the landing and doesn’t… bite 🧟😂.

Primate Review

 

Lucy brings some friends to her Hawaiian cliffside home for vacation, until the family’s adopted pet chimp, Ben, is infected with rabies, then things quickly turn deadly, and the group must fight to survive…

The movie does not start off with the strongest dialogue; the script tries very quickly to establish everyone in their relationships to one another, and so you get a lot of clunky lines that are trying to establish exposition, like “You know I got your back, best friend” and “It’s been so long since I’ve seen you, sister.” And I will admit there are some odd lines throughout the film, like “Boy, I had some bad gas station sushi last night,” but once the actual family gets together, their interactions feel very natural and sweet.

My favorite actor in this was Troy Kotsur (who played the dad in CODA); his character of the dad is very likable, and he brought a lot of emotion to the role that wasn’t necessarily on the page.

The movie has a great location, very tropical and peaceful looking, and the filmmakers are able to get a lot of cool shots out of it.

The characters in this are like the ones you’ve seen in any other slasher movie; they’re young, they want a party, they do drugs, and they get horny. It’s nothing you haven’t seen before. But the cast is solid, and when things get intense, the actors are good at emoting “scared and tense” facial acting.

So Ben the chimp is clearly a guy in a costume, but the filmmaker shoots it in a way that it isn’t too obvious, and the actual prosthetics for the face are very well detailed and convincing. Plus the more ravenous Ben gets, the more creepy, distorted, and slimy it gets (like whoever was in charge of the mouth slobber did a very effective job lol). It definitely adds to the atmosphere of the movie.

I feel like this goes without saying, but I wouldn’t go into this movie looking for realism. Because whatever strand of rabies Ben got turned him into a full-on slasher villain. He’s got a tablet where he’ll type ominous things into, or he’ll jump from somewhere for a bigger jump scare, like he goes full Michael Myers at certain points.

The special effects for the kills are really effective and well done for a small-budget film. Like that opening kill definitely had me going “god damn,” and throughout the rest of the film, all the attacks definitely have a visceral effect that will definitely get people squirming in their seats.

So the characters get trapped in a pool with Ben watching them, and the movie is good about setting up the scenarios of “how are they going to get out of this one?” and the movie did a good job of making me sit there going, “Yeah, how are they going to try and think their way out of this?” Now there was nothing mind-blowing, and there were some helpful conveniences, but in the moment I was definitely interested to see what the characters would come up with.

Yeah, there are two characters added who really are just there to add to the body count who are not very smart, but there was one laugh I got out of it, and one of the characters' kills was one of the more intense of the movie, so that was very effective.

I like the soundtrack; it definitely had a throwback 80s since “John Carpenter” feel, but it had a nice style to it and worked in the scenes well.

Again, there were a couple scenarios where the characters are trying to evade Ben, and you think he’s about to get them or they’re trying to get away, but he keeps getting closer to them that I thought were pretty creative and quite effective and had some fun visuals to them.

So Primate is a killer ape movie. I feel like by that premise alone you’re either going to be with the movie or not, so recommending it is definitely up to the viewer's discretion, but as far as a movie about a killer ape goes, I would describe Primate as solid. It isn’t anything you haven’t seen before, and for most people it’ll be a one and done, but the filmmaking is capable, everyone in the cast and crew does their best, and there are some effective sequences when it comes to the gore and scares. So I would say this movie would just be best enjoyed on a lazy Saturday when you just want to watch a fun popcorn movie. I give the film somewhere between a low and regular three stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️ depending on how you feel about “Killer Monkey” movies, but either way I can definitely say the movie does know how to go… Bananas 🍌 😂

Wicked: For Good Review

 

Wicked: For Good picks up sometime after the first film and follows the Wicked Witch and her battle against the wizard for the freedom of Oz and her relationship with Glinda and Glinda wrestling with her own feelings between her loyalty to the Wicked Witch and her new position in the Emerald City as “Glinda the Good.”

Small nitpick right off the bat… The film could’ve done better at establishing how much time has passed between films. Like, they say it’s been “12 ocean cycles” since the Wicked Witch escaped, so I thought maybe it had been 12 months, but then I heard my friend say in the play it’s supposed to be four years, so I don’t know how long it’s been? I wish we had gotten a better indication about how much time had passed.

The best thing about the film, in my opinion, is the special effects and the color palette. This film is very bright and vibrant; it’s like an Easter party exploded in pastels lol. The film has a great deal of spectacle, although some sequences do feel a little bit wooden and undershot. Like, I thought the final big emotional number between the wicked witch and Galinda felt very undershot and kind of flat. It’s supposed to be like this big sweeping emotional number like defying gravity was, and I’m sure the filmmakers wanted to make it feel more personal between the characters, and that’s why they filmed it the way they did, but unfortunately it takes a scene that should’ve been more grandiose and just makes it feel a bit too undercooked.

I am no expert in musicals, but I thought the numbers were good. I’ve seen that some people aren’t as impressed as with the first, and while I agree they aren’t as catchy as some of the first one, I thought as a continuation of the story, the music fits with the other film perfectly.

I feel mixed on the characters. I think Grande and Arrivo’s performances are very strong and passionate, and Jeff Goldblum brings a lot of devilish charm as the wizard, but the wicked witch’s sister felt very rushed and almost manic in her emotional decision-making. Michelle Yeoh's character is fun in a conniving villain sort of way but felt underdeveloped as far as motivation. Plus, her resolution was very rushed and doesn’t make much narrative sense given exactly what she can do.

Unfortunately, one of the places the film wavers is the incorporation of the original Wizard of Oz characters into the film; they feel rushed and almost out of place with the rest of the story. It’s like the movie can decide if it’s going to be a direct tie-in to the original film or if it’s going to be its own thing like Maleficent or Cruella. It tries to have its cake and eat it too, and unfortunately the two melt together like peanut butter and oil.

Like certain characters have these big setups, but absolutely no payoff; some feel like an afterthought, and some feel like they needed much more explanation.

Also, they don’t spend a whole lot of time on the wicked witches’ “fight for animal freedom,” like it was a big driving force and set up in the first one, but it doesn’t play as big a role in the story as I expected.

This also affects the pacing as well; certain plot elements felt like they went on a bit too long, and others felt like they could’ve used more screen time. I do think the film is entertaining enough throughout to keep people’s interest, but the more you think about it, the sloppier the story seems.

I have mixed feelings on Jon M. Chu’s direction. Like, he’s good with the big crowded scenes, and I think it gets pretty creative with some shots like “the girl in the bubble” musical sequence. But others feel rather flat, like the final scene between the Wicked Witch and Glinda. It’s written and feels like this big emotional scene between the two characters and kind of a payoff to the whole story, but the way it’s filmed feels so underutilized that it takes away some of the emotional payoff from the scene.

I think whoever the costume designer is has a very good chance of winning the Oscar this year; the costumes are very well detailed and distinct, and for so many different background characters, they come up with a lot of interesting patterns and designs.

I wouldn’t say Wicked: For Good is a bad film; it’s creative, and you want to see how everything concludes, but it definitely doesn’t live up to its own potential as a sequel to the first film or as a tie-in to the bigger Wizard of Oz mythos. I give Wicked: For Good a high three stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️ it’s more like “Wicked: For OK”, but that’s not as catchy a title lol.

Marty Supreme review

 

Marty Mauser, an aspiring table tennis champion, is fiercely determined to prove his greatness and gets into a whole lot of wild situations in pursuit of his dream.

Timothée Chalamet gives a pretty phenomenal performance. He brings a lot of energy, charisma, and charm to the character, which is needed because Marty is definitely a prickly character. Marty has such a huge ego about his dream and his own greatness that he will do whatever and screw over whoever to achieve it; he’s downright unlikable at certain points, and he takes advantage of a lot of people around him. He kind of feels like he could be the uncle of Adam Sandler’s character in Uncut Gems. I could see audiences being split on how they feel about Marty at the end of the film, because you go back-and-forth between sort of liking him and mostly hating him. It’s very much a “to the viewer’s discretion” type of thing, but either way you land, I think everyone will agree Chalamet brings a lot of humor and complexity to Marty.

I like the way it was directed. First of all, the 1950s New York sets are very realistic and convincing. That, mixed with a lot of the handheld directing and the director’s knack for finding extras who feel like “Joe who lives down the street,” makes the filmmakers great at making you feel like you’ve been transported back in time and the world feels very fleshed out and real. It’s one of the highlights of the film.

Gwyneth Paltrow brings a lot of charm and a grounded sense to the film as a famous actress who has an affair with Marty; their dynamic is rather interesting, and I like the actors' fiery back-and-forth interplay, although I do wish her character got a better wrap-up because she just kind of disappears from the movie at one point, and I think she deserved a better conclusion.

The movie is also very manic and truly “wild,” like you’ll be watching, and things will be moving along in a normal place, and then it’s like someone flips a switch, and then something pops out of nowhere and happens and escalates things incredibly quickly such that it takes a minute to even realize what happened. I know some people who have seen the director’s previous work, like Uncut Gems, say they get very anxious watching the movies because they’re so tense and high energy, and well, I don’t think it’s as intense as Uncut Gems. I would caution people who are very sensitive to that when going to this one because it definitely has its big blowout moments.

Odessa A'zion plays Rachel (another love interest for Marty), and I think the actress brought a lot of emotional pathos to the character that might not have been there on the page, but she is definitely one of the more likable and sympathetic characters in the story.

Apparently, Chalamet spent years practicing table tennis for the role, and you can really tell in the match scenes, the back-and-forth energy, and all the different special moves. They do; it’s really impressive.

One of my favorite parts was Géza Röhrig; as an older table tennis player and role model for Marty, the actor is very down to earth and likable, although his story does go into an odd direction. I won’t spoil anything, but… That was an odd scene; you’ll know it when you see it lol.

Fran Drescher plays Marty’s mom, and while it’s not a big role, I think Drescher did great with the part, and it’s always nice to see her pop up in projects.

The film also stars Kevin O'Leary, who in real life is a businessman and plays… A businessman, who helps Marty. And for someone who isn’t

an actor who has to act, O’Leary gives up a surprisingly strong and layered performance as someone you develop mixed feelings on, so I have to give the actor and director big props for that.

Tyler the Creator plays Marty’s friend in the film, and I had never seen Tyler the Creator in person before and didn’t even know it was him until after the movie, so I can tell you, he gave a very funny and down-to-earth performance and definitely helps you acclimate to Marty and his character.

Abel Ferreira has a supporting role in the film, and he’s always fun to watch. I do think the movie runs a bit too long, and I only really bring that up here because I thought how they wrapped up his story felt a little odd in the overall pacing of the film, but that’s more of a nitpick on my part.

I really enjoyed the soundtrack. Usually I’m not a big fan of movies when a period piece uses songs from a different era of time; it can take you out of the movie. But the way they were woven into the scenes and the overall songs chosen were fun and fit the tone of the film. Not to mention the original score was very mellow and easy to listen to, which was a good juxtaposition to the tense and wild antics of the story.

Like I mentioned before, I like how the director cast regular people or seemingly regular people as extras; it really makes the scenes feel real. Not to mention there are scenes that take place in New York City and scenes that take place in Japan, and the way they capture both cities and cultures felt very authentic and well detailed; it really immerses you into the film.

Overall, Marty Supreme is a very well-made movie. The story and pacing may not be the tightest, and the characters may frustrate you, but Marty’s journey of following his dreams and coming to peace with himself and his goals in life is enjoyably well told, and I think we’ll be sympathetic to most people, despite Marty’s assholishness lol. I give Marty Supreme either a low three stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️ or a high four stars ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️… Depends on how I’m feeling about Marty at the time 😂